Patients who suffering with Covid-19 virus are highly benificial by getting physicaltherapy Treatment. Physicaltheapy perform specialized exercises for lungs and peform hihly skilled prone position exercises by using postural drainage techniqes.
Oxygen transport from the lungs to body tissues can be limited in patients with an ineffective cough or an impairment of normal mechanisms of mucociliary clearance. An array of techniques for assisting the mobilization of airway secretions is available for patients and caregivers to augment a patient’s own mechanisms. When prescribing an optimal method of airway clearance, the caregiver must consider the pathophysiology and the clinical manifestations of the disease, the physiological basis of the method, availability of the technique to the patient, and the patient’s acceptance of the technique.
This chapter reviews the physiological basis of each airway clearance technique (ACT), the history of its use, and research on its effectiveness. An introduction to the application of these techniques to patients is presented. Also addressed are the benefits and burdens of each technique, contraindications and precautions, and practical concerns regarding patient care.
Evidence for the use of airway clearance techniques is often difficult to evaluate, in part due to agreement that top-level evidence on this topic is lacking.1a-b The components of a given treatment have not been standardized and the literature refers to ACTs using a variety of terms, including chest physiotherapy, chest physical therapy (CPT), bronchial drainage, postural drainage (PD) therapy, and bronchial hygiene. In addition, the availability of equipment and cultural differences in its application confound research results. Differences in the outcome measures for a given technique also occur—some studies use wet or dry (dehydrated) sputum volume or radioaerosol clearance, whereas other studies use pulmonary function tests, radiographic evidence, or arterial blood gases to asses the effectiveness of a specific technique. The majority of secretion clearance research has been focused on patients with cystic fibrosis, as the need for ongoing secretion removal is apparent in this population. However, results showing a treatment to be effective in one cross section of patients must not be generalized to apply to the treatment across all patients with pulmonary disease.
Historically, the gold standard of airway clearance has been a combination of postural drainage, percussion, and vibration with cough. This has been challenged1b-c as more techniques have been demonstrated to be effective. Postural drainage and percussion have been shown to be ineffective in some cases and, in fact, to be detrimental to pulmonary status in others. Caregivers have also been shown to suffer from the performance of percussion; repetitive-motion injuries of the wrists have been documented as a result of regular performance of percussion.2,3
Alternative techniques have arisen out of the need to find effective methods for those patients not responsive to traditional methods. A desire to increase adherence with airway clearance, especially in patients approaching adolescence and adulthood, has led to an investigation of more independent techniques.4 Many of these techniques have been practiced longer in other countries, but are now commonly used by practitioners in the United States.
It is important to remember, however, that secretion clearance is just one step toward realizing effective gas exchange in the complex oxygen transport pathway.5 Airway clearance, when indicated, should be integrated into a comprehensive plan of care, including positioning and mobilization, to optimize oxygen transport.
Airway clearance techniques differ with respect to equipment needs, the skill level required to perform them, and their usefulness with various clinical problems. Matching a patient with an appropriate method or combination of methods may increase effectiveness, reduce complications, and promote long-term adherence to the treatment. This will, in turn, assist with achieving the goals of airway clearance: reducing airway obstruction, improving ventilation, and optimizing gas exchange.
Preparation for any secretion removal technique should include evaluation of the patient’s pulmonary status so that measures may be compared before and after a treatment is provided. A physical examination, including inspection, palpation, measurement of vital signs, and chest auscultation, provides assessment of a treatment’s effectiveness. Other outcome measures include chest radiographs, arterial blood gas measurements, and pulmonary function studies. An adequate intake of fluids (as allowed) decreases the viscosity of the secretions, allowing easier mobilization.
Several factors must be taken into account when scheduling an optimal time for airway clearance. At least 30 minutes to 1 hour should be allowed for the completion of tube feedings or meals. The inhalation of bronchodilator medications should take place before airway clearance maneuvers to improve secretion removal by opening the airways. Inhaled antibiotics are best scheduled after airway clearance has taken place for optimal deposition of medication. If necessary, adequate pain control should be provided to receive a patient’s best effort and cooperation with a treatment.
In addition to improving many outcomes in patients with lung disease, exercise has been shown to assist in secretion clearance.25-28 Exercise increases mucociliary transport in patients with chronic bronchitis.28 Higher transpulmonary pressure with aerobic exercise may open closed bronchi, as well as increase collateral ventilation to allow mucus to be moved.26 It has also been shown that exercise-induced hyperventilation is more effective than eucapnic hyperventilation in mobilizing bronchial secretions.29 The contribution of increased expiratory airflow and exercise-induced coughing are other factors in improving secretion removal. Exercise for secretion clearance has focused on aerobic or endurance exercise; however, any form of exercise must be adapted to the individual patient’s status and abilities.
Based on a lack of decrease in lung function following the cessation of PD and percussion but the continuation of an exercise program, or based on the improvement in pulmonary function, exercise has been recommended as a replacement for a conventional chest physiotherapy routine in some patients or at some stages of lung disease.26,27,30,31 In hospitalized patients with cystic fibrosis, no significant change in pulmonary function was reported when exercise was substituted for two of three daily treatments of PD, percussion, and vibration, and the weight of the sputum produced was equivalent.30 In terms of mucus cleared, no significant differences were found among exercise on a cycle ergometer, postural drainage, and PEP mask breathing.32 Increases in sputum expectoration on exercise days as opposed to nonexercise days have also been reported.27,33
However, other studies conclude that exercise alone is not sufficient and recommend its use as a complement to other forms of airway clearance. Airway clearance using PD and FET was shown to be more effective than exercise with a cycle ergometer in inducing sputum expectoration.34 Results from Bilton and colleagues35 demonstrated that any modality that included the active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) in PD positions alone or in combination with exercise is better than exercise alone at clearing sputum.
It is difficult to compare these studies, however, because the mode and length of exercise differ, as do the outcome measures of effectiveness of airway clearance. Exercise as an airway clearance technique is not suitable for the very young (younger than 4 to 5 years of age), for patients with neuromuscular limitations, or for patients with limited exercise tolerance. Moreover, the potential need for supplemental oxygen during exercise should be monitored. Nonetheless, evidence suggests that an exercise program, in addition to clearing secretions, may decrease morbidity and mortality by improving exercise capacity.36,37
A walking program requires only a suitable pair of shoes and a safe location. Higher-impact exercise, because of increased stress on the knees, requires shoes specifically for that purpose. Clothing should be appropriate for the weather if exercising outdoors.
Exercise equipment suitable for a patient who is beginning an exercise program includes the treadmill, bicycle ergometer, elliptical trainer, mini-trampoline, or arm ergometer. For more accomplished exercisers or patients with a higher exercise tolerance, equipment may include a stair climber, cross-country ski machine, or rowing machine. Numerous other exercise equipment options are available; the patient’s interests should be the primary factor for choosing.
Tools to monitor a patient’s response to exercise include a sphygmomanometer, stethoscope, heart rate monitor, pulse oximeter, and a scale to measure patient’s level of perceived exertion (Figure 21-1). In a home setting, patients should be knowledgeable in self-monitoring exercise intensity. For those patients who require closer monitoring, a pulse oximeter may be rented from an oxygen supply company. Monitoring of vital signs before and during exercise, and during recovery, will allow titration of the workload for optimal performance.
The principles of an exercise prescription addressing mode, intensity, duration, and frequency, as well as principles of “warm up” and “cool down,” should be followed when using exercise as a form of airway clearance. Individualizing an exercise program for each patient is of the utmost importance.
Patients hospitalized for an acute exacerbation may not be able to initially perform endurance exercise. These patients should be started slowly and progressed as tolerated; consider using interval training.
A regular, consistent program of exercise should be scheduled around the patient’s daily activities to achieve adherence (e.g., walking the dog, sports at school, stopping by the health club after work).
Exercise has the advantage of being the only airway clearance technique that is performed regularly by people without lung disease. This factor can make it appealing to those patients who do not want to call attention to their differences from their peers. Exercise may improve self-esteem, a sense of well-being, and quality of life. Higher levels of exercise tolerance in patients with cystic fibrosis have been demonstrated to improve survival.37
Some patients may not tolerate the amount or frequency of exercise necessary for this to be the sole method of airway clearance. Thus various airway clearance techniques can be used as adjuncts to exercise. This is particularly true during an acute exacerbation when activity tolerance is limited, or in infants or patients with neurological or musculoskeletal limitations. Andreasson26 observed that regular contact with a caregiver seems to be necessary for successful exercise training, as does family support, especially in young children. This points out the difficulty with adherence to a home program. Adherence will also be affected by a patient’s preference for a particular activity, scheduling conflicts, and commitment by friends and family members.
Several precautions must be observed when using exercise as a form of airway clearance. Care must be taken in prescribing exercise to patients with hyperreactive airways or a tendency toward oxygen desaturation. Desaturation has been shown to occur with exercise in individuals with pulmonary disease,38,39 and therefore it becomes prudent to monitor oxygen saturation, providing supplemental oxygen for the exercise period when indicated. Exercise-induced bronchospasm must also be considered when pulmonary compromise is seen with exercise, especially with higher-intensity exercise.40 When medication is indicated, it is recommended to provide an inhaled bronchodilator 20 to 30 minutes before exercise to alleviate this symptom.41 Use of bronchodilator medication and supplemental oxygen may be necessary to improve exercise tolerance, but these patients require closer monitoring as well. Andreasson26 reports a risk for pneumothorax associated with exercise in patients with extensive bullae.
In patients who are very young, who have limited ability to cooperate, or who are not adherent to other ACTs, percussion, shaking, and vibration offer methods for dislodging retained secretions. However, because of the force transmitted to the thoracic cage with these techniques, there are many precautions and contraindications to consider. The therapist should not make this decision alone but should seek direction from the medical team. These treatments are not completely benign and should not be performed in the absence of good indications.42
Percussion has been shown to contribute to a fall in PaO2 in acutely ill patients,43 especially in patients with cardiovascular instability44 and in neonates.45 The factor that seems most closely associated with or predictive of this effect is the patient’s baseline PaO2.42 Cardiac dysrhythmias have been associated with chest percussion for bronchial drainage11 and Huseby46 hypothesizes that hypoxemia may be the underlying mechanism of CPT-caused cardiac arrhythmias.
Patients with hyperreactive airways (e.g., asthma) show intolerance for percussion as part of airway clearance. Campbell and colleagues47 demonstrated a fall in FEV1 associated with percussion; it was not evident when percussion was omitted. Administration of a bronchodilator before treatment with percussion precluded the fall in FEV1. Wheezing has also been associated with percussion and vibration in patients with cystic fibrosis and COPD.48,49
Box 21-1 summarizes the precautions and contraindications for external manipulation of the thorax associated with percussion, shaking, and high-frequency chest compression. Vibration involves less force to the thorax and may be better tolerated than the aforementioned techniques. A nebulized bronchodilator may be administered during a treatment of high-frequency chest compression to avoid the consequences of hyperreactive airways. Box 21-1 Contraindications to External Manipulation of the Thorax in Addition to Contraindications for Postural Drainage
Hemoptysis From AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Postural drainage therapy, Respiratory Care 36:1418-1426, 1991; and Crane L: Physical therapy for the neonate with respiratory disease. In Irwin S, Tecklin JS, editors: Cardiopulmonary physical therapy, St. Louis, 1985, Mosby.
Postural drainage, also known as bronchial drainage, is a passive technique in which the patient is placed in positions that allow gravity to assist with the drainage of secretions from the bronchopulmonary tree. PD is accomplished by positioning the patient so that the angle of the lung segment to be drained allows gravity to have its greatest effect (Figure 21-2). Positioning the patient to assist the flow of bronchial secretions from the airways has been a standard treatment for some time in patients with retained secretions.50
Knowledge of the anatomy of the tracheobronchial tree is vital to effective treatment. Each lobe to be drained must be aligned so that gravity can mobilize the secretions from the periphery to the larger, more central airways. The mechanism of postural drainage is considered to be a direct effect of gravity on bronchial secretions, although observations made by Lannefors (1992)32 that gravity also influences regional lung ventilation and volume suggest that these mechanisms are also involved.
PD has been shown to be effective in mobilizing secretions in patients with cystic fibrosis,51,52 bronchiectasis,10 and other pulmonary diseases.53,54 Other treatments, such as percussion, vibration, and the active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT), may be used while the patient is in postural drainage positions.
There are, however, many contraindications to gravity-enhancing positioning for PD. Recent studies have reported adverse effects of head-down or Trendelenburg positions required for the lower lobes. Modified positions should be used for head-down positions unless it has been shown to be effective in a particular patient. The head of the bed should remain flat instead of being tipped into the Trendelenburg (head down) position.
For the hospitalized patient, electric beds allow patients to be positioned more easily. Air therapy beds, most often used in the intensive care unit (ICU), are valuable aids for positioning, especially in patients who are large or unresponsive.
In the ICU, it is imperative to be familiar with the multiple lines, tubes, and other devices attached to the patient (see Chapter 16). Allow enough slack from each device to position a patient for postural drainage.
For the patient with an adequate cough to expectorate secretions, have tissues or a specimen cup available. Have suctioning equipment ready to remove secretions from an artificial airway or the patient’s oral or nasal cavity after the treatment. Refer to Chapter 43 for a discussion of suctioning.
After determining the lobe of the lung to be treated by auscultation and chest x-ray, position the patient in the appropriate position, supporting the patient comfortably in the position indicated (see Figure 21-2).
If postural drainage is used exclusively, each position should be maintained for 5 to 10 minutes, if tolerated, or longer when focusing on a specific lobe. Coordinating the positioning with nursing care for skin pressure relief may allow the time spent in a position to be extended. If postural drainage is used in conjunction with another technique, the time in each position may be decreased. For example, if percussion and vibration are performed while the patient is in each PD position, 3 to 5 minutes is sufficient.
It is not always necessary to treat each affected lung segment during every treatment; this may prove to be too fatiguing for the patient. The most affected lobes should be addressed with the first treatment of the day, with the other affected areas addressed during subsequent treatment(s).
The patient should be encouraged to take deep breaths and cough after each position, if possible, and again after the treatment is completed. Having the patient sit upright or lean forward optimizes this effort by allowing the use of the abdominals for a stronger cough.55
Mobilization of secretions may not be apparent immediately after the treatment, but this may occur up to 1 hour later. The patient should be thus informed and reminded to clear secretions at a later time. A health care practitioner or family member should be included in this aspect of treatment, especially with patients who need encouragement.55
Postural drainage is relatively easy to learn; the patient and/or caregiver must be familiar with the appropriate positioning for the affected lung fields. Treatment in the hospital may be coordinated with other patient activities, such as positioning for skin pressure relief, bathing, or positioning for a test or procedure. Home treatment can be coordinated with activities such as reading or watching television.
For many patients, optimal PD positions will be contraindicated for a variety of reasons and modified positions should be used. Adherence to PD may be a challenge because of the length of the treatment; this is especially challenging in the pediatric population, who will require considerable distraction to maintain a desired position for the appropriate length of time. Children who are able to role-play the treatment—for instance, with a doll or stuffed toy—may better understand what is expected and be more cooperative with therapy.
The cost of the equipment required for PD is minimal. The cost of a caregiver’s time to provide the treatment, however, especially in the case of a chronic disease, may be substantial. A family member should be taught the procedure, if possible, to decrease the cost and provide flexibility in scheduling.
It is essential that the therapist and the health care team discuss treatment priorities when deciding to use PD positions. A decision to use postural drainage might be made despite a contraindication if the benefits are thought to outweigh the risks in a particular case. For example, it is known that use of the Trendelenburg (head-down) position increases intracranial pressure in patients after neurosurgery.56 However, if the patient develops atelectasis, the stress of respiratory embarrassment may also increase intracranial pressure. In this instance, the decision may be made to position the patient to clear the atelectasis and subsequently return to a modified conservative regimen.55
A fall in arterial O2 saturation has been reported with the use of postural drainage for airway clearance, although the effects of PD were not separated from additional techniques.46,57 Therefore O2 saturation levels should be monitored during treatment, especially in patients with known low PaO2 values.
Caution must also be used in treating a patient with end-stage lung disease in postural drainage positions because of the risk for hemoptysis.58,59 Decreased cardiac output60,61 has been associated with chest physiotherapy treatment; however, the effects of postural drainage were not separated from those of percussion and vibration.
Many physical therapists working with the pediatric population almost never use the head-down position in treating infants but rather a modified routine that excludes the Trendelenburg position. The head-down position has been shown to increase the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in neonates.16 Button and colleagues62 found that the head-down position is associated with gastroesophageal reflux, distressed behavior, and lower oxygen saturation in infants with cystic fibrosis. It should be noted that a finding of gastroesophageal reflux can occur even 1 hour after treatment. A modified routine that eliminates head-down positioning is associated with fewer respiratory complications.63 Box 21-2 summarizes the precautions and contraindications concerning postural drainage. Box 21-2 Contraindications for Postural Drainage
Acute heart failure or cor pulmonale From AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Postural drainage therapy, Respiratory Care 36:1418-1426, 1991; and Crane L: Physical therapy for the neonate with respiratory disease. In Irwin S, Tecklin JS, editors: Cardiopulmonary physical therapy, St. Louis, 1985, Mosby.
Percussion, sometimes referred to as chest clapping, is a traditional approach to secretion mobilization. A rhythmical force is applied with a caregiver’s cupped hands against the thorax, over the involved lung segments, trapping air between the patient’s thorax and the caregiver’s hands (Figure 21-3), with the aim of dislodging or loosening bronchial secretions from the airways so they may be removed by suctioning or expectoration. This technique is performed during both the inspiratory and expiratory phases of breathing. Percussion is used in postural drainage positions for increased effectiveness64,65 and may also be used during ACBT. For individuals with pulmonary disease, percussion in conjunction with postural drainage continues to be a mainstay of the treatment, especially for pediatric patients and patients who are unresponsive.
The proposed mechanism of action of percussion is the transmission of a wave of energy through the chest wall into the lung. This wave loosens secretions from the bronchial wall and moves them proximally, where ciliary motion and cough (or suction) can remove them. The combination of postural drainage and percussion has been shown to be effective in secretion removal.66-68
A handheld mechanical percussor can be used by a caregiver to minimize fatigue or may be used by the patient to self-administer percussion. The effectiveness of mechanical as opposed to manual percussion has been studied. Maxwell and Redmond69 found mechanical percussion equivalent to manual percussion in effecting removal of secretions. Although there was a significant increase in pulmonary function with manual techniques, Pryor and colleagues70,71 supported the use of mechanical percussion in patients, using the forced expiration technique. A study by Rossman and colleagues72 was in disagreement, finding that mechanical percussion did not enhance postural drainage in secretion removal.
There are contraindications to percussion. If a patient’s pulmonary status is of greater concern than the relative contraindications, a decision may be made to administer the treatment, with appropriate modifications.
For the adult and older pediatric population, electric or pneumatic percussors that mechanically simulate percussion are available. This enables a patient to apply self-percussion more effectively. Several models have variable frequencies of percussion, as well as different levels of intensity.
Several devices, including padded rubber nipples, pediatric anesthesia masks, padded medicine cups, or the bell end of a stethoscope may be used to provide percussion to infants whose chest walls are too small to accommodate the size of an adult’s hand.
A thin towel or hospital gown should cover the patient’s skin where the percussion is to be applied. The force of percussion over bare skin may be uncomfortable; however, padding that is too thick absorbs the force of the percussion without benefit to the patient.
Adjust the level of the bed so that the caregiver may use proper body mechanics during the treatment. The caregiver may become excessively fatigued or injured as a result of lengthy or numerous treatments if proper body mechanics are ignored.
Position the hand in the shape of a cup with the fingers and thumb adducted. It is important to maintain this cupped position with the hands throughout the treatment, while letting the wrists, arms, and shoulders stay relaxed.
The sound of percussion should be hollow as opposed to a slapping sound. If erythema occurs with percussion, it is usually a result of slapping or not trapping enough air between the hand and the chest wall.73
The force applied to the chest wall from each hand should be equal. If the nondominant hand is not able to keep up with the dominant hand, the rate should be slowed to match that of the slower hand. It might be helpful to start with the nondominant hand and let the dominant hand match the nondominant hand.55 The force does not have to be excessive to be effective; the amount of force should be adapted to the patient’s comfort.
If the size of an infant does not allow use of a full hand, percussion may be done manually with four fingers cupped, three fingers with the middle finger “tented,” or the thenar and hypothenar surfaces of the hand.74
Hand position should be such that percussion does not occur over bony prominences of the patient. The spinous processes of the vertebrae, the spine of the scapula, and the clavicle should all be avoided. Percussion over the floating ribs should also be avoided because these ribs have only a single attachment.
Percussion should not be performed over breast tissue. This will produce discomfort and diminish the effectiveness of the treatment. In the case of very large breasts, it may be necessary to move the breast out of the way with one hand (or ask the patient to do this) and percuss with the other hand.
A patient may be taught to perform one-handed self-percussion to those areas that can be reached comfortably, either manually or with a mechanical percussor. This does, however, virtually preclude the treatment of the posterior lung segments.
The addition of percussion to a PD treatment may enhance secretion clearance and shorten the treatment. Patients, especially young children and infants, often find the rhythm soothing and are relaxed and sedated by percussion.
Patients with chronic lung disease who have used PD and percussion for many years and have found it effective may be reluctant to try an alternative method of airway clearance. Acceptance of this method is dependent on the consistent availability of a family member or other caregiver to provide the treatment. Mechanical percussors allow a patient more independence or decrease fatigue of a caregiver, and they are especially useful in patients requiring ongoing treatment at home.
Percussion is not well tolerated by many patients postoperatively without adequate pain control. The force of percussion may also be contraindicated in patients with osteoporosis or coagulopathy. Percussion has been associated with a fall in oxygen saturation, which can be eliminated with concurrent thoracic expansion exercises and pauses for breathing control.75
Delivering percussion for extended periods on an ongoing basis can result in injury to the caregiver, whether a family member or a health care provider; repetitive motion injuries of the upper extremities may occur in long-term delivery of percussion for airway clearance.
The expense of a mechanical device for percussion is minimal compared with the ongoing cost of a caregiver to provide percussion and PD, either in the hospital setting or at home. In the case of young children or unresponsive patients, there are few choices for airway clearance. For other populations, however, a more independent method can prove to be more cost-effective if adequate adherence is achieved.
The techniques of vibration and shaking are on opposite ends of a spectrum. Vibration involves a gentle, high-frequency force, whereas shaking is more vigorous in nature. Vibration is delivered through a sustained co-contraction of the caregiver’s upper extremities to produce a vibratory force while applying pressure to the chest wall over the involved lung segment. Shaking is similar in application to vibration, and is described as a bouncing maneuver, sometimes referred to as “rib springing,” supplying a concurrent, compressive force to the chest wall. Like percussion, vibration and shaking are used in conjunction with PD positioning. Unlike percussion, they are performed only during the expiratory phase of breathing, starting with peak inspiration and continuing until the end of expiration. The compressive forces follow the movement of the chest wall. Both techniques require the assistance of a caregiver, but a mechanical vibrator may be used in place of manual vibration.
It is proposed that vibration and shaking enhance mucociliary transport from the periphery of the lung fields to the larger, central airways. Because the compressive force to the thorax is greater with shaking than vibration, it produces increased chest wall displacement, and the stretch of the respiratory muscles may produce an increased inspiratory effort and lung volume.76 The same relative contraindications for percussion should be observed for shaking, because it involves the application of force to the thorax.
Pavia77 demonstrated a higher, though not statistically significant, rate of secretion clearance and sputum production with vibration. However, this study was conducted while subjects were in the upright position only, which does not replicate the use of vibration clinically. Many studies do not separate the effects of vibration from the components of PD and percussion because they are often used in conjunction. In fact, many studies describe the techniques of PD, percussion, and vibration or shaking as a single entity and refer to the treatment as chest physical therapy or postural drainage therapy. Mackenzie and colleagues78 demonstrated significant improvement in total lung/thorax compliance after treatment with postural drainage, percussion, and vibration in mechanically ventilated patients. Feldman and colleagues48 demonstrated improved ventilatory function by improved expiratory flow rates in patients receiving postural drainage, percussion, vibration, and directed coughing.
For vibration, the hands may be placed side by side or on top of each other, as shown in Figure 21-4. As with shaking, the patient is instructed to take in a deep breath while in a proper PD position. A gentle but steady co-contraction of the upper extremities is performed to vibrate the chest wall, beginning at the peak of inspiration and following the movement of chest deflation. The frequency of manual vibration is between 12 and 20 Hz.44,53
For shaking, with the patient in the appropriate PD position, place your hands over the lobe of the lung to be treated and instruct the patient to take in a deep breath. At the peak of inspiration, apply a slow (approximately 2 times per second), rhythmic bouncing pressure to the chest wall until the end of expiration. The hands follow the movement of the chest as the air is exhaled. The frequency of shaking is 2 Hz.44,53
The use of vibration and/or shaking in addition to PD may enhance the mobilization of secretions. Shaking or vibration may be better tolerated than percussion, especially in the postsurgical patient. Manual vibration and shaking allows the caregiver to assess the pattern and depth of respiration. The stretch on the muscles of respiration during expiration may encourage a deeper subsequent inspiration. A mechanical vibrator, more commonly used with pediatric patients, may be preferable for delivery of airway clearance in the long-term.
The patient cannot apply these techniques without assistance, except in a limited manner with a mechanical vibrator, so adherence and regular administration of vibration depends on caregiver availability.
The same contraindications for percussion apply because shaking and vibration involve compression to the thorax. The technique of vibration is less constrained by these contraindications than is shaking.
The technique of manual hyperinflation was used more commonly in the past for patients requiring mechanical ventilation. However there is not enough evidence to promote the regular use of this technique that has many contraindications and that is not well known in the United States.80 A brief description of the technique and its precautions follows. Two caregivers are needed to perform the technique with the patient placed in PD positions.79 One caregiver uses a manual inflation bag to hyperinflate the lungs with a slow, deep inspiration and, after a short pause, provides a quick release to allow rapid exhalation. A second caregiver applies shaking or vibration at the beginning of exhalation to mobilize secretions. The technique is promoted to mobilize secretions and reinflate collapsed areas of the lung and is likened to simulating a cough—deep inspiration, pause, and forceful exhalation.
Clement80 reported that this method of airway clearance enabled patients to be maintained on ventilators for long periods while retaining normal lung function. It was also demonstrated that the addition of positioning and vibrations enhanced the treatment of atelectasis by hyperinflation and suctioning.81